首页> 外文OA文献 >Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model: An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism
【2h】

Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model: An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism

机译:使用横向模型问敏感问题:测量抄袭的实验调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Yu, Tian, and Tang (2008) proposed two new techniques for asking questions on sensitive topics in population surveys: the triangular model (TM) and the crosswise model (CM). The two models can be used as alternatives to the well-known randomized response technique (RRT) and are meant to overcome some of the drawbacks of the RRT. Although Yu, Tian, and Tang provide a promising theoretical analysis of the proposed models, they did not test them. We therefore provide results from an experimental survey in which the crosswise model was implemented and compared to direct questioning. To our knowledge, this is the first empirical evaluation of the crosswise model. We focused on the crosswise model because it seems better suited than the triangular model to overcome the self-protective "no” bias observed for the RRT. This paper-and-pencil survey on plagiarism was administered to Swiss and German students in university classrooms. Results suggest that the CM is a promising data-collection instrument eliciting more socially undesirable answers than direct questioning
机译:Yu,Tian和Tang(2008)提出了两种新的技术来询问人口调查中的敏感主题:三角形模型(TM)和横向模型(CM)。这两个模型可以用作众所周知的随机响应技术(RRT)的替代方法,并且可以克服RRT的某些缺点。尽管Yu,Tian和Tang对提议的模型提供了有希望的理论分析,但他们并未对其进行测试。因此,我们提供了实验调查的结果,在该调查中实施了交叉模型并将其与直接提问进行了比较。据我们所知,这是交叉模型的第一个实证评估。我们专注于交叉模型,因为它似乎比三角形模型更适合克服RRT的自我保护性“无”偏见,这项针对窃的纸笔调查在瑞士的德国教室和大学教室进行。结果表明,CM是一种很有前途的数据收集工具,比直接提问更能引起社会上不受欢迎的答案

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号